← Companies regulators have named
REGULATOR ACTION
亞洲廣場
SFC Hong Kong — via IOSCO I-SCAN (International Securities & Commodities Alerts Network) published a warning naming 亞洲廣場, dated 12 December 2022. In its own words: “Securities and Futures Commission (Hong Kong) alert, published via IOSCO I-SCAN #36781. Category: Other. Products: Other. Name: 亞洲廣場 (Chinese name only).” Read it at the source ↗
To cite: The Market Standard, “亞洲廣場 — what regulators have published”, marketstandard.org/company/50922. Cite the authority’s own publication as the primary source.
This records what named authorities published — it is not our finding.
The published record
Every regulator warning, enforcement publication and published consumer complaint we hold, newest first. Inclusion is the authority's statement in its own terms, not a court finding.
| Date | Country | Authority | Type | What it says | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 December 2022 | Hong Kong | SFC Hong Kong — via IOSCO I-SCAN (International Securities & Commodities Alerts Network) | Warning | Warning or alert list entry naming it — the regulator’s own page says why “Securities and Futures Commission (Hong Kong) alert, published via IOSCO I-SCAN #36781. Category: Other. Products: Other. Name: 亞洲廣場 (Chinese name only).” [+]“Securities and Futures Commission (Hong Kong) alert, published via IOSCO I-SCAN #36781. Category: Other. Products: Other. Name: 亞洲廣場 (Chinese name only).” | Historical (>3 yrs) — 2022 | Open source |
Details ↗
“Securities and Futures Commission (Hong Kong) alert, published via IOSCO I-SCAN #36781. Category: Other. Products: Other. Name: 亞洲廣場 (Chinese name only).”
Licences on registers we hold
Inclusion on a register is not a recommendation. What the public registers we hold record under this name. A register entry confirms permissions in that jurisdiction, not an endorsement.
No entry of this name in the registers we hold. That is a statement about our registers, not a finding that the firm is unlicensed: we hold 11 registers, and a licence issued elsewhere would not appear here whether or not it is real. Which registers we hold.
Sanctions name-matches
No crypto address in our copy of the OFAC list is designated under this name. That list covers only designations that carry a crypto address; it is not a full sanctions screen.
Broker discovery record
The broker discovery engine holds no record under this name or website in its published corpus. That is a statement about one corpus, not about the subject.
Before you send money
Protect yourself before committing funds to any financial entity or platform.
Check the register directly
Always check the regulator's own official register and use only the contact details published there, never the details given in a message or cold call.
How to protect yourself
If a firm is not authorised to operate in your country, you will have no access to statutory compensation schemes or the financial ombudsman if things go wrong.
Report an unauthorised firm
If you have been targeted by an unauthorised firm or lost funds, report it to your national financial authority and police. Where to report →
What this record does not tell you
- It is not our finding. Nothing on this page says this subject committed fraud. It records what named authorities published, on the dates shown.
- A warning is the regulator's statement, not a conviction. Many lists name firms that are not licensed in that jurisdiction, or that were reported by the public.
- Same name, different entity. Names are matched as written. A legitimate firm can share a name with a warned entity, and clones copy real names deliberately.
- Absence is not clearance. An entity with no page here may simply not have been warned about yet — that is the normal state of a new fraud.
- Something wrong? Tell us — we correct the record and say so. Tell us
← Companies regulators have named · Check a company · How we check what we publish